comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: weird behavior of Triangulate
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: weird behavior of Triangulate [message #81272] Sat, 01 September 2012 18:26 Go to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Jenny writes:

> David, thanks for sharing. I did compared results from GRIDDATA and
> those from a Fortran code (both using inverse-distance method)for my
> first set of data, and they look identical. So seems GRIDDATA work ok
> for small datasets. However, I agree that for large datasets, such as
> Landsat, other languages (i.e Fortran, C) are much more efficient. I
> don't understand why we shouldn't have confidence in results from
> GRIDDATA? and why it doesn't always work?!

It is reassuring to me that I am not the only one
asking these questions! :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. Thinking I might have made a mistake with my LandSat
problem, I tried it again earlier this afternoon. I ended
up having to reboot my computer to get things back in
working order. :-(



--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Idl error handling - is there a way to force a time out?
Next Topic: Parrallel Matrix Inversion in IDL?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:12:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.66097 seconds