comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » cd to nonexistent directory and up again
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
cd to nonexistent directory and up again [message #81708] Tue, 16 October 2012 03:33 Go to next message
tom.grydeland is currently offline  tom.grydeland
Messages: 51
Registered: September 2012
Member
Why is it that this fails:


IDL> cd, 'bobo/..'
% CD: Unable to change current directory to bobo/...
No such file or directory

but this does not:

IDL> cd, './bobo/..'
IDL>


I am using CD to determine whether a given path exists as a directory, and I was expecting the second case to fail just like the first one does, since there is no difference between them in my mind.

Cheers,

Tom
Re: cd to nonexistent directory and up again [message #81788 is a reply to message #81708] Wed, 17 October 2012 08:25 Go to previous message
Lajos Foldy is currently offline  Lajos Foldy
Messages: 176
Registered: December 2011
Senior Member
On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 3:05:14 PM UTC+2, tom.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:33:19 PM UTC+2, tom.gr...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
>> I am using CD to determine whether a given path exists as a directory, and I was expecting the second case to fail just like the first one does, since there is no difference between them in my mind.
>
>
>
> Thanks to all those who replied, but I am afraid you're not touching upon my question. I am sorry I have not made my point clearly enough.
>
>
>
> 1) In a world where directories can be symbolically linked, it is not necessarily true that './bobo/...' is equal to '.', even when 'bobo' exists. Truncating away 'bobo/..' on the assumption that they are the same is arguably incorrect, but it is certainly confusing if it is done in some cases and not in others!
>
>
>
> 2) In the regular Unix shells, 'ls -ld bobo/..' and 'ls -ld ./bobo/..' both fail, with the error message that the file or directory does not exist.
>
>
>
> 3) FILE_TEST shows the same strange difference between 'bobo/..' and './bobo/..':
>
>
>
> IDL> print, file_test('./bobo/..', /dir)
>
> 1
>
> IDL> print, file_test('bobo/..', /dir)
>
> 0
>
>
>
> It looks like I will have to do what I was hoping to avoid:
>
>
>
> 1) given a path like 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', use file_test(x, /dir) on every sub-path x:
>
> file_test('foo', /dir)
>
> file_test('foo/bar', /dir)
>
> file_test('foo/bar/baz', /dir)
>
> file_test('foo/bar/baz/..', /dir)
>
> file_test('foo/bar/baz/../quux', /dir)
>
> file_test('foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', /dir)
>
>
>
> If IDL cannot be relied upon to fail in the next step when one or more of these path components don't exist, then I must test every one of them.
>
>
>
> 2) If all of these tests pass, then
>
>
>
> cd 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', curr=old
>
> cd, old, curr=pwd
>
>
>
> 3) pwd is now the fully-qualified path to the directory indicated by 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..'
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Tom


Well, symbolic links solve some problems, and create some others :-)

Quick and unportable hack: you can get the real path by calling 'realpath' in your Linux C library:

IDL> in_path='foo/bar/baz/../quux/..'
IDL> out_path=string(replicate(32b, 1024))
IDL> x=call_external('/lib64/libc-2.11.3.so', 'realpath', in_path, out_path, /ul64_value, value=[1,1], /auto_glue)

(adjust it to your system.)

If in_path does not exist, x will be zero, otherwise out_path will contain the real path.

regards,
Lajos
Re: cd to nonexistent directory and up again [message #81792 is a reply to message #81708] Wed, 17 October 2012 06:05 Go to previous message
tom.grydeland is currently offline  tom.grydeland
Messages: 51
Registered: September 2012
Member
On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 12:33:19 PM UTC+2, tom.gr...@gmail.com wrote:

> I am using CD to determine whether a given path exists as a directory, and I was expecting the second case to fail just like the first one does, since there is no difference between them in my mind.

Thanks to all those who replied, but I am afraid you're not touching upon my question. I am sorry I have not made my point clearly enough.

1) In a world where directories can be symbolically linked, it is not necessarily true that './bobo/...' is equal to '.', even when 'bobo' exists. Truncating away 'bobo/..' on the assumption that they are the same is arguably incorrect, but it is certainly confusing if it is done in some cases and not in others!

2) In the regular Unix shells, 'ls -ld bobo/..' and 'ls -ld ./bobo/..' both fail, with the error message that the file or directory does not exist.

3) FILE_TEST shows the same strange difference between 'bobo/..' and './bobo/..':

IDL> print, file_test('./bobo/..', /dir)
1
IDL> print, file_test('bobo/..', /dir)
0

It looks like I will have to do what I was hoping to avoid:

1) given a path like 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', use file_test(x, /dir) on every sub-path x:
file_test('foo', /dir)
file_test('foo/bar', /dir)
file_test('foo/bar/baz', /dir)
file_test('foo/bar/baz/..', /dir)
file_test('foo/bar/baz/../quux', /dir)
file_test('foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', /dir)

If IDL cannot be relied upon to fail in the next step when one or more of these path components don't exist, then I must test every one of them.

2) If all of these tests pass, then

cd 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..', curr=old
cd, old, curr=pwd

3) pwd is now the fully-qualified path to the directory indicated by 'foo/bar/baz/../quux/..'


Cheers,

Tom
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Transparent Image Overlays
Next Topic: Dialog_Pickfile Whack-a-Mole

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:28:05 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00602 seconds