| Re: PRINTF format statement [message #83681] |
Fri, 29 March 2013 07:33 |
Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On 3/28/13 8:20 pm, Phillip Bitzer wrote:
> Well, that's exactly how I would've done it. In fact,
>
> IDL> this_gmag = '12.399'
> IDL> PRINT, '<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>'+this_gmag+'</dd>'
> <dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>12.399</dd>
> IDL> OPENW, lun, 'test.txt', /get_lun
> IDL> PRINTF, lun, '<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>'+this_gmag+'</dd>'
> IDL> FREE_LUN, lun
>
> works for me. I'm guessing the text file written by IDL is correct (i.e., all one line) but the HTML is formatting the problem. But, using the example at
>
> http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_dt.asp
>
> seems to indicate this is the expected HTML output. In fact, the <dt> is for a definition list. Perhaps you want/need a different tag?
>
By the way, I have a template class which is very handy for doing much
of this type of stuff.
For example,
template = obj_new('MGffTemplate', 'template.tt')
template->process, { this_gmag: strtrim(12.399, 2) }, 'template.html'
obj_destroy, template
In the template.tt, would be:
<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>[% this_gmag %]</dd>
In your small example above, it's not hard to use PRINTF, but if you are
generating an entire HTML file, it's pretty painful. The template syntax
also allows FOR loops, IF statements, etc.
Mike
--
Michael Galloy
www.michaelgalloy.com
Modern IDL: A Guide to IDL Programming (http://modernidl.idldev.com)
Research Mathematician
Tech-X Corporation
|
|
|
|
| Re: PRINTF format statement [message #83682 is a reply to message #83681] |
Thu, 28 March 2013 19:20  |
Phillip Bitzer
Messages: 223
Registered: June 2006
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Well, that's exactly how I would've done it. In fact,
IDL> this_gmag = '12.399'
IDL> PRINT, '<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>'+this_gmag+'</dd>'
<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>12.399</dd>
IDL> OPENW, lun, 'test.txt', /get_lun
IDL> PRINTF, lun, '<dt>g Mag:</dt><dd>'+this_gmag+'</dd>'
IDL> FREE_LUN, lun
works for me. I'm guessing the text file written by IDL is correct (i.e., all one line) but the HTML is formatting the problem. But, using the example at
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_dt.asp
seems to indicate this is the expected HTML output. In fact, the <dt> is for a definition list. Perhaps you want/need a different tag?
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
