comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: poly

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: poly_fit for less number of points

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: poly_fit for less number of points [message #84225 is a reply to message #84215]

Sat, 04 May 2013 07:02

sid
Messages: 50
Registered: January 1995

Member

On Saturday, May 4, 2013 4:14:28 PM UTC+5:30, sid wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have only 6 x values and y values, for example
>
> my x = [3932.9321,3933.0452,3933.1162,3933.2514,3933.3517,3933.4271 ]
>
> y = [0.090313701,0.084354165,0.080794218,0.075102273,0.074025219 ,0.082037902]
>
> I have to fit this with polynomial, I tried svdfit and poly_fit. But are not giving good fit. Please suggest me a way to fit these data points.
>
>
>
> thanking you in advance
>
> sid

Thank you very much sir it works. But can you please suggest me is there any other fit available to fit this kind of dataset. Because I want to get a smoothed fit.
thanking you in advance
sid

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Craig Markwardt on Mon, 06 May 2013 13:26
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Heinz Stege on Mon, 06 May 2013 11:02
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Jeremy Bailin on Mon, 06 May 2013 06:48
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: David Fanning on Sun, 05 May 2013 15:03
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Craig Markwardt on Sun, 05 May 2013 12:59
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: sid on Sat, 04 May 2013 07:02
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Heinz Stege on Sat, 04 May 2013 05:00
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Craig Markwardt on Sun, 05 May 2013 12:55
		Re: poly_fit for less number of points By: Yngvar Larsen on Tue, 07 May 2013 01:20

Previous Topic:	idlwave online help error
Next Topic:	the problem for GPULIB+IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 23:43:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00188 seconds