comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Speeding up data crunching using IDL_IDLBridge with asychronous execution
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Speeding up data crunching using IDL_IDLBridge with asychronous execution [message #85180 is a reply to message #85175] Wed, 10 July 2013 12:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Chip Helms is currently offline  Chip Helms
Messages: 24
Registered: November 2012
Junior Member
Alright, so I tried looking at a couple things with the following code:

pro memissue
mbegin=(memory())[0]
; create the object outside the loop (no difference memory-wise...just faster to run)
o = obj_new('IDL_IDLBridge',output='out_memissue.asc')
; write bridge memory
o->execute, 'print, "ini", (memory())[0]'
for i=0,100 do begin
m0 = (memory())[0]
o->Execute, 'x = 1' , /nowait

;wait for execution to complete (I doubt this is needed for 'x=1'...but just incase)
while (o->status() ne 0) do wait, 0.1
;Nata's additions----
all_var='tmp_var'
o->Execute, all_var+'=ROUTINE_INFO(''$MAIN$'',/VARIABLES)'
all_var=o->GetVar(all_var)

command='DELVAR, '+STRJOIN(all_var,', ')
o->Execute, command
;End of Nata's additions-----

m1 = (memory())[0]
if (i gt 0) then begin
print
print,'iteration: ',i
print,'Memory lost in this step thru loop: ', m1 - m0
print,'Total memory lost since beginning: ',m1-mbegin
print
endif
; write iteration memory
o->execute, 'print, '+strtrim(i,2)+', (memory())[0]'
endfor
; write final memory
o->execute, 'print, "fin", (memory())[0]'
;wait for any remaining execution to complete (really shouldn't be needed)
while (o->status() ne 0) do wait, 0.5
; destroy object
obj_destroy, o
; o->Cleanup
mfinal=(memory())[0]
print, 'Total run memory difference:', mfinal-mbegin
end


From what I've seen, nothing is gained by deleting the variables within the bridge (the bridge output file has 768987 for (memory())[0] at each iteration regardless of variable being deleted or not, which doesn't seem quite right to me). As far as the difference in memory between start and end of the parent: 210245 regardless of if I include "o->Execute, command" or not. If I comment out "/nowait" I find that every iteration has a 0 for memory lost and the total run difference is 2421. Without "/nowait" the bridge memory returns 769163 every iteration. So to my untrained eye, it seems like execute with "/nowait" produces something (maybe some sort of placeholder?) that isn't taken care of before moving on, but I have to admit that's just speculation on my part. On the upside, it seems to be restricted to only execute calls that are asynchronous (at least on my machine).
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Asynchronous IDL_IDLBridge causing memory leak
Next Topic: New graphics from IDLde and the command line

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 07:33:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.20310 seconds