comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Your experience with other scientific languages?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Your experience with other scientific languages? [message #86453] Mon, 11 November 2013 09:11 Go to previous message
Fabzi is currently offline  Fabzi
Messages: 305
Registered: July 2010
Senior Member
IDLers,

It is not my intention to start a troll-like discussion here. I am
reading this newsgroup since a couple of years now and I really
appreciate the friendly tone of this group (I followed some other groups
where arrogant people argued with other arrogant people... awful).
Having said this, I am wondering why we are never talking about other
languages. Is it to avoid trolls like me, or because EXELIS people also
read this group? (did I emphasize already how much I appreciate the
reactivity of Mark and Chris on this group? ;-))

To my point: I am starting a career in academia and my future employer
and colleagues don't use IDL. I could argue with my future boss and make
him pay for an IDL license. But I am seriously wondering if I want to do
this during my whole career (taking the risk to always be the only one
using IDL), and I am thinking about leaning Python. I've been searching
a bit for pro and cons, and since I am in the atmospheric sciences I
came to this website for example:
http://pyaos.johnny-lin.com/?p=544

Such a topical argument can last for ever, starting with the pros and
cons of open-source VS commercial softwares. So I will try to limit the
discussion to a couple of points:

- Map Projections: pyproj relies on the state-of-the art proj.4, and can
do Datum shifts (it seems). IDL's system is quite old and can't do datum
shifts.
- Graphics: I read in a VISualize presentation that IDL's objective was
to be "better than Python" in plotting (can't find the PDF anymore).
Does that mean that Python is really good at plotting?
- Statistics: my feelings says that Python probably has many more tools
"out-of-the-box" due to the larger community.
- Easiness of use: I am a Linux user so I am not afraid of installing
some packages, but I'm told that python is quite complicated in this
respect.

My question: did some of you have experience with python or similar
languages and if yes, what was your impressions *from the IDL user
perspective*? Any thoughts are appreciated!

Thanks,

Fabien
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: PSYM=10 + POLYFILL = ?
Next Topic: mgunit 1.4.0 released

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:08:14 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00225 seconds