| Re: Function Graphics Questions [message #87233 is a reply to message #87232] |
Fri, 17 January 2014 13:14   |
chris_torrence@NOSPAM
Messages: 528
Registered: March 2007
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Friday, January 17, 2014 9:53:56 AM UTC-7, David Fanning wrote:
> Chris Torrence writes:
>
>
>
>> Can you post your plot with the bad lines somewhere, or email it to me?
>
>
>
> Hi Chris,
>
>
>
> Out of town at the moment and my e-mail is causing me problems. But, you
>
> can get the code that produces the image in question here:
>
>
>
> http://www.idlcoyote.com/gallery/additional_axes_plot_fg.pro
>
>
>
> The image it produces is called additional_axes_plot_fg.png.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> David
>
> --
>
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
>
> Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
>
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
>
> Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thos speakest truth.")
Okay, I got it all to run. You're right, it looks pretty chunky at 600 pixels. I had toyed around with adding "anti-aliasing" to the output, but I never finished the code. I'll dig it up and see if I can get it into the next release.
It would basically do the same thing - construct the output at a high resolution, then scale it down to the desired resolution and output the result. The advantage would be that it wouldn't need to write out an intermediate file or rely on imagemagick.
-Chris
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
