comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » No Raster Image via Imagemagick

Home » Public Forums » archive » No Raster Image via Imagemagick

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick [message #88992 is a reply to message #88991]

Thu, 10 July 2014 07:16

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Morgan Silverman writes:

> Oh, good to know. Thanks. I guess the moral of the story here is, I need to continually produce PostScript files when plotting to make sure what I'm creating looks good in a hard copy and not just looks good on the screen.

Yes, and I think you will find it easier to do outside of a cgWindow.
Now that you have all your graphics commands in a single file, I find it
easier to just do this:

cgPS_Open, 'myfile.png'
DoMyThingWithGraphicsProgram
cgPS_Close

This creates (and deletes) the intermediate PostScript file. The end
result is a PNG file of high quality. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thue. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Wed, 09 July 2014 11:12
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Wed, 09 July 2014 12:53
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Wed, 09 July 2014 12:57
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 05:34
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 06:53
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:00
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:13
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: David Fanning on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:16
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 07:58
		Re: No Raster Image via Imagemagick By: morganlsilverman on Thu, 10 July 2014 09:57

Previous Topic:	improve calculation time
Next Topic:	computation time for convolution

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 02:38:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80053 seconds