comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » CGContour with and without cell_fill keyword
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
CGContour with and without cell_fill keyword [message #89925] Mon, 29 December 2014 09:03 Go to previous message
envi35@yahoo.ca is currently offline  envi35@yahoo.ca
Messages: 48
Registered: March 2005
Member
Hi all, I'm using CGContour to make maps of vegetation index. I found my maps look quite different when I plot with or without the /cell_fill keyword as in the following lines:

CGContour,lai,lon,lat,/cell_fill,c_colors=c_colors,Levels=us erLevels,max_value=dmax,min_value=dmin,C_CHARTHICK=2,/overpl ot, Color=black,missingvalue=nan

CGContour, lai,lon,lat,c_colors=c_colors,Levels=userLevels,max_value=dm ax,$
min_value=dmin,C_CHARTHICK=2,/overplot, Color=black,missingvalue=nan

I know David suggests using cell_fill for projected maps or data with missing values, I thought that's just for making the map looks good, e.g. without holes etc., but not different maps.

The map without the cell_fill keyword shows larger values (more realistic to me)than the map with the keyword. Does anybody knows why? Which map is correct?

Thanks very much,
Jenny
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: cgMap error!
Next Topic: _overloadMinus: what to do with invalid input?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:33:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00393 seconds