comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL8.4 hard crash

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL8.4 hard crash [message #90314 is a reply to message #90313]

Thu, 19 February 2015 07:19

Fabzi
Messages: 305
Registered: July 2010

Senior Member

On 19.02.2015 15:40, Chris Torrence wrote:
> But I think in this case, since we're indexing using strings,
>then we know that we want a hash for the sub-container. I'd hate
> to complicate it further with a keyword that I have to document.

The argument of the string indexes is true if you have more than one
nested level.

Just in case you are thinking of a Hash() improvement for a future IDL,
it would be good not to be limited to default hashes only, as does
python's defaultdict. The roblem of course is that my example is flawed:

a = hash(DEFAULT=list())

is not okay. I shouldn't give an instance of list but rather a "type"
list or so:

a = hash(DEFAULT='list')

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL8.4 hard crash By: JDS on Wed, 18 February 2015 12:37
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: bill.dman on Wed, 18 February 2015 12:55
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Wed, 18 February 2015 13:18
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: JDS on Wed, 18 February 2015 13:47
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Wed, 18 February 2015 14:18
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: Fabzi on Thu, 19 February 2015 00:22
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Thu, 19 February 2015 06:40
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: Fabzi on Thu, 19 February 2015 07:19
		Hash auto-instantiation (was IDL8.4 hard crash) By: chris_torrence@NOSPAM on Thu, 19 February 2015 10:28
		Re: IDL8.4 hard crash By: Fabzi on Wed, 18 February 2015 14:21

Previous Topic:	raw contents of data memory
Next Topic:	Ring in function graphics

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:12:02 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00380 seconds