comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Matlab <--> PV-Wave ?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Matlab <--> PV-Wave ? [message #9262 is a reply to message #9159] Fri, 13 June 1997 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Jonathan Rogness is currently offline  Jonathan Rogness
Messages: 7
Registered: April 1997
Junior Member
Paul van Delst wrote:
>
> Hmm. I *wish* IDL had the extensive numerical toolboxes that Matlab
> does. You can accuse Matlab of a lot of things, but lacking in
> numerical routines ain't one of them. IDL _still_ uses Numerical
> Recipes routines for goodness sake. It is well known that some
> Numerical Recipes routines that come with the book have bugs in them.

Well, I've never seen any library that doesn't have a few bugs lurking
in it. Numerical Recipes _does_ have some bugs in it (see
http://nr.harvard.edu/nr/upgrade/latest-known-bugs.html), but there
seems to be a trend of spurious bug reports associated with it as well.
(See http://nr.harvard.edu/nr/bug-rebutt.html)

> Some people here have switched from IDL to Matlab because of the
> strength of the latter's numerical toolboxes in optimising non-linear
> inverse problems in atmospheric remote sensing

I can't speak from the Matlab point of view, but I'll agree with those
people who aren't satisfied with IDL's non-linear optimising routines.
Too slow for me -- I write my own routines in C and link them to the NAG
library.

Jon
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Formatted read of text file
Next Topic: XBM_EDIT not working in IDL 5.0

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 06:52:16 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.04205 seconds