Re: Anyone using insight, or idlde? [message #9471 is a reply to message #9363] |
Wed, 02 July 1997 00:00   |
Mirko Vukovic
Messages: 124 Registered: January 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
In article <33B9A4A9.1565@magellan1.rutgers.edu>,
Axel Schweiger <axel@magellan1.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> In my view, INSIGHT is a complete joke. It is extremely slow and
> very cumbersumber to use. I was looking forward to a point and
> click interface that would let me plot,modify and annotate graphs
> interactively. This kludge of sliders and buttons at best seems
> 10 years behind.
>
> I would have put it in the demo applications box.
>
> As a user of IDL who uses it mostly for scientific
> processing and analysis, the graphic objects interface doesn't help
> me one bit (At least not that I can tell).
>
> Axel
> Increasingly disgruntled IDL user.
>
> David Fanning wrote:
>>
>> Matt Phelps writes:
>>
>>> Is anyone using insight or idlde yet (5.0 graphical interface
>>> tools)? I'm interested in impressions of others to see if I'm
>>> crazy or not. I find insight EXTREMELY slow and unresponsive.
>>> One of our users also reports random dissappearing acts for
>>> idlde.
>>
>> I agree with your impressions of INSIGHT. I find I don't have
>> the patience to use it.
>>
>> But I couldn't do without the IDLDE, at least in its Windows
>> incarnation. I think along with the chromochome editor that
>> this is one of the best things RSI has ever created. It's slick.
>> It works. It makes programming a pleasure. I like it a LOT!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> David
I was at a local idl presentation (in the bay area) and was pretty
impressed with insight. It is indeed slow now, but wait 18 months, and I
bet the cpu's will start catching up. I also liked very much the
live_surface function. It is usefull in data analysis and visualisation.
regarding the editors on win95, emacs with font-locking is also very
nice. I use it as my main editor.
mirko
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
|
|
|