comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » contour...pathfile problem in WAVE
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
contour...pathfile problem in WAVE [message #9651] Fri, 01 August 1997 00:00
Fred Wolf is currently offline  Fred Wolf
Messages: 1
Registered: August 1997
Junior Member
hi,

I have a problem with the contour routine in pv-wave.
I would like to directly access the contour-paths that
the contour program calculates.

E.G. The comand

contour,x,levels=[0],PATH_FILENAME="cont", /FOLLOW

is suposed to write the 0-contours of x in the file
"cont". Any indiviudal contour-data-set starts with
a header of the structure

h = {CONTOUR_HEADER, TYPE : 0B, HIGH : 0B, LEVEL : 0, $
NUM : 0L, VALUE : 0.0}

followed by NUM floating coordinate pairs.

When I try to read the file cont, I get junk.
The main problem is that h.num appears to contain a
fantasie number instead of the number of contour points.
A minor problem is that any closed contour-path begins
with the coordinates (0,0).
The following sequence of comands ilustrates the problem:

x = shift(dist(20),10,10)^2-16
contour,x,levels=[0],PATH_FILENAME="cont", /FOLLOW, /noerase
h = {CONTOUR_HEADER, TYPE : 0B, HIGH : 0B, LEVEL : 0, $
NUM : 0L, VALUE : 0.0}

y = fltarr(2,34)
openr,1,"cont"
readu,1,h
readu,1,y
close,1
print,h

plot,y(0,*),y(1,*)

print,h gives "{ 1 0 0141733920768 0.00000}"
while the contour-path however actualy contains only 34 but not
141733920768 entries.

Is this a bug? Does anybody know how to reveal the true number of
contour-path entries?

Thanks a lot in advance
Fred


************************************************************ ************
Fred Wolf E-Mail: fred@chaos.uni-frankfurt.de
Max-Planck-Institut
f. Stromungsforschung
Bunsenstr. 10 Tel: 0551/5176-423
D-37073 Gottingen Fax: (49)551/5176-402
Germany
************************************************************ ************
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL on 16-bit X display?
Next Topic: Long Pathname problems

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:16:59 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00240 seconds