comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Imaginary is narrow minded

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Imaginary is narrow minded

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Imaginary is narrow minded [message #9844 is a reply to message #9842]

Wed, 03 September 1997 00:00

meron
Messages: 51
Registered: July 1995

Member

In article <jackel.140.20AC6E36@danlon.physics.uwo.ca>, jackel@danlon.physics.uwo.ca (Brian Jackel) writes:
> Greetings
>
> <Rant>
> I'm stuck with IDL 4.0, and was wondering if the snazzy new version
> still gives this stupid error
>
> % IMAGINARY: Operand must be of complex type:
>
> Alternatively, I'd love to know _why_ it can't just return a zero value.

I wrote my own function, M_IMAGINARY, which takes care of just this
problem, and I use it exclusively instead of the IDL IMAGINARY.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Imaginary is narrow minded By: Christian Soeller on Wed, 03 September 1997 00:00
		Re: Imaginary is narrow minded By: meron on Wed, 03 September 1997 00:00
		Re: Imaginary is narrow minded By: davidf on Tue, 02 September 1997 00:00
		Re: Imaginary is narrow minded By: davidf on Tue, 02 September 1997 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Size of variables in bytes?
Next Topic:	IDL -> MPEG

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Oct 13 05:08:25 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.40191 seconds