comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE [message #10442 is a reply to message #10441]

Thu, 04 December 1997 00:00

Janko Hauser
Messages: 1
Registered: December 1997

Junior Member

There is a way to see this from another angle. If you want a
programming enviroment for RAD with a strong numerical and OO and GUI
and internet background then there is the possibility to use a truly
OO language with many extensions for all these fields. Python with the
Numerical extension, TK , Pil (image handling and transformation,
Opengl, VTK.

I really can't say much about the OO in IDL or Matlab, but Python does
all this in a very nice way, and for the most parts also efficient.

He, to bring a little bit of an objective view in this :-), there is
also a similar development in the perl camp, but I prefer python for
...

You have no runtime costs, you can deliver the same application on a
very broad spectrum of OS's and architectures and you can use many
different packages from all fields of computing.

Just to give here another view, don't want to start a war.

__Janko

PS: mail me for more information or look at www.python.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE By: davidf on Thu, 04 December 1997 00:00
		Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE By: Janko Hauser on Thu, 04 December 1997 00:00
		Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE By: David Ritscher on Thu, 04 December 1997 00:00
		Re: opinions needed on IDL, PV-WAVE By: davidf on Wed, 03 December 1997 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Q: background of text ?
Next Topic:	Re: Making a directory in an IDL routine.

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 17:08:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.11926 seconds