comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl*
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* [message #11703 is a reply to message #11701] Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00 Go to previous message
roberson is currently offline  roberson
Messages: 5
Registered: May 1998
Junior Member
In article <Pine.OSF.3.95.980506183704.6207A-100000@poseidon.ifctr.mi.cnr.it>,
Sebastiano Barbieri <nospam@ifctr.mi.cnr.it> wrote:
:Somebody whose message I've just lost proposed to moderate comp.lang.idl,
:and somebody else reacted saying that one won't even reach the more than 100
:yes votes necessary to do it, because comp.lang.idl is virtually dead and has
:less than 100 readers (I do not know whether it's true) and proposed to close
:it.

I was the respondant. The previous exchanges can be found via
www.altavista.digital.com or www.dejanews.com .


:If you close it, could one rename the ever-confusing comp.lang.idl-pvwave to
:comp.lang.idl ? I believe the majority of (RSI) IDL users, which are more
:than 100, would find that easy.

That would leave out the Visual Numerics PVWAVE users unless a new
newsgroup such as comp.lang.pvwave were also created. It does not seem
to me that volume of PVWAVE messages distinct from IDL messages would
be high enough to warrant a split. As newsgroup votes are always held
independantly, this could easily lead to a situation where
comp.lang.idl-pvwave was renamed to comp.lang.idl but comp.lang.pvwave
was rejected, which would leave the PVWAVE users with no newsgroup.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Workstation or X-Terminal ?
Next Topic: idl under Windows NT behaviour

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:55:32 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00409 seconds