comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL 5.2 Reviews
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews [message #13327 is a reply to message #13234] Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00 Go to previous message
David Foster is currently offline  David Foster
Messages: 341
Registered: January 1996
Senior Member
Craig Hamilton wrote:
>
> Matthew J. Sheats wrote in message <3639D5CB.9B59DCE3@lanl.gov>...
>> However, I think the greatest addition is the new data types (for me at
>> least). 16-bit unsigned integer, 32-bit unsigned long
>> integer, 64-bit long integer, and 64-bit unsigned long integer.
>> Invaluable to me anyway.
>
> Those new datatypes are definitely useful - now I'm waiting
> on a complex 16-bit signed integer datatype..... that is the datatype that
> most (all?) MRI scanners use for their acquired data. Are there
> folks other than MRI types that would find this useful?

Craig -

I believe that most people that use MRI images, like our group,
are using the images after they have been reconstructed. At this
point they are simple 16-bit signed integer images.

Dave
--

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
David S. Foster Univ. of California, San Diego
Programmer/Analyst Brain Image Analysis Laboratory
foster@bial1.ucsd.edu Department of Psychiatry
(619) 622-5892 8950 Via La Jolla Drive, Suite 2240
La Jolla, CA 92037
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Object Surface Shaded by Elevation (LONG)
Next Topic: Re: clipboard objects and postscript (unix)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 16:29:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.40360 seconds