comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Linux vs Win95

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Linux vs Win95 [message #13579 is a reply to message #13239]

Thu, 26 November 1998 00:00

Karsten Rodenacker
Messages: 98
Registered: July 1997

Member

The thread has turned to emacs vs idlde.

I'm also using (x)emacs on unix and idlde on NT, however I prefer xemacs
(and the development under unix). Idl under the latter behaves IMHO more
reasonable.

Still I would appreciate to get some improvements of idl.el and
idl-shell.el e.g. the color-coding of user and inbuilt procedures and a
key for 'widget_control,/reset&heap_gc&close,/all&retall '.

--
Karsten Rodenacker
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------:-)
GSF - Forschungszentrum Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry
D-85758 Oberschleissheim Postfach 11 29
Tel: +49 (0)89 3187 3401 | FAX: ...3369 | MAILTO:rodena@gsf.de
http://www.gsf.de/institute/ibb/Rodenacker/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Linux vs Win95 By: Richard Link on Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: Karsten Rodenacker on Thu, 26 November 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: Vapuser on Wed, 25 November 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: R.Bauer on Tue, 24 November 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: R.Bauer on Wed, 02 December 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: J.D. Smith on Tue, 01 December 1998 00:00
		Re: Linux vs Win95 By: Vapuser on Mon, 30 November 1998 00:00

Previous Topic:	shade_surf - plots: scaling??
Next Topic:	MOVIES USING MPEG_PUT

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 04:25:22 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12395 seconds