comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Linux vs Win95
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Linux vs Win95 [message #13599 is a reply to message #13239] Tue, 24 November 1998 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
R.Bauer is currently offline  R.Bauer
Messages: 1424
Registered: November 1998
Senior Member
Richard Link wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm considering purchasing IDL for a Pentium system, and I will have both
> Linux and Win95
> mounted on separate disks. I've been using IDL on SunOS/Solaris for several
> years, but
> I've never used the Windows version. Any recomendations, pro/con?
>
> I have an extensive Fortran F77/90 & C++ development environment installed
> under Windows,
> so it would probably make sense to get IDL for Windows. However, Linux may
> be a better
> option
>
> TIA,
> Rick

I am using a unix system and a PC too. In the past I have written a lot of
sources with emacs and idl mode. As the idl developmet comes to the windows
platforms I am myself switched more and more to this development. The
difference to emacs on the unix is that it is not color coded but on the PC it
is.
This colorcoding of procedures, functions, own procedures and own functions is
very helpfull.

It seems momentanly to me that's some features if neccessary or not are only
builded for the windows platforms e.g. a widget_builder

R.Bauer
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: shade_surf - plots: scaling??
Next Topic: MOVIES USING MPEG_PUT

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 10:10:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.51936 seconds