comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 24-bit/8-bit color (Re: read_tiff - simple question)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
24-bit/8-bit color (Re: read_tiff - simple question) [message #14495] Mon, 01 March 1999 00:00 Go to previous message
steinhh is currently offline  steinhh
Messages: 260
Registered: June 1994
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:

> P.S. I've just received the latest batch of IDL books from
> the printer. This version has been updated rather extensively
> for IDL 5.2. I have also increased the amount of discussion
> on 8-bit verses 24-bit image display, as this continues to
> be a source of confusion for many IDL users as we make the
> transition from 8-bit to 24-bit computers.

So what's the "upgrade fee" :-)

Seriously, I'd like to take this opportunity to add something to
the discussion we had a while ago, concerning pseudo-8-bit
behaviour etc:

I (and some others) expressed concern that RSI should be doing
something about the inability (on 24-bit PC displays) to do e.g.

TVSCL,IMAGE & XLOADCT

from the command line in order to "explore" an image by tweaking
the color map. I believe I (we) speak for a substantial user
group in this matter - having to redisplay an image to see color
table changes is just *not* acceptable for command line work.

Why should users of "new and improved" hardware + "new and
improved" IDL versions have to go through a lot of programming
hassle (or use canned programs) in order to do something that
could be done in an intuitive way in the "good old days"...

So, along the same lines that IDL does offer graphics window
backing store, I think RSI should offer the possibility of
"value" backing store, i.e. storing the 8-bit color table index
and automatically updating the display colors whenever a new
color table is loaded.

Having thought about this for a while, I think it would be best
if this was done on a "per-window" basis. I.e., when creating a
new window, one could specify whether or not it was intended for
interactive (command line) color table manipulation. That way, the
full 24-bit color scale would be available to [widget] programs,
while at the same time allowing the user to do explorative color
table changes in non-program windows (this is all the more
important now that we have the active command line alongside
widget programs).

It would also be nice to make the DECOMPOSED=0/1 status be a
property of whatever window is currently set, to avoid having to
set this status in programs every time graphics output is about
to occur.

I realize that there will be some penalty wrt. efficiency, but
this penalty will be a lot smaller if the functionality is
offered by IDL internally, rather than by *always* requiring the
use of programmed "TV wrappers" with callback functions to
deal with both decomposition and color table updates.

As an extra bonus, it would be *very* nice if one could specify
more than one such "interactive colormap" - i.e. along the lines
of:

window,0 ;; Default window creation, means "use the
;; current colormap (let's call it "map1"),
;; in interactive mode ("value" backing store)

tvscl,image1 ;; Display image1 with this color map

window,1 ;; Create new window, still using map1

tvscl,image2

xloadct ;; Manipulate current map, with instant
;; update of window 0 and 1 (since they're
;; both using the map that's manipulated).

newmap = obj_new('pseudomap') ;; Create a new (interactive)
;; colormap
window,2,pseudo=newmap ;; Both windows share this new map
window,3,pseudo=newmap ;;
:
xloadct ;; Manipulates current (i.e. "newmap") color table,
;; updating window 2 & 3, no effect on 0 and 1.

wset,0 ;; Now we're switching to a window using map1
xloadct ;; Manipulate map1 again.. no effect on window
;; 2 and 3, but instant update of 0 and 1.

In the case of an 8-bit display, all the color tables would
probably be identical, with changes to one reflected in all
windows. Or maybe one could still have different color tables
internally, and the effective one (the one that's actually
communicated to the screen hardware) would depend on which window
was selected/active (wset)?

Any comments/improvements?

Regards,

Stein Vidar
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL reader for medical images
Next Topic: menu accelerators?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:14:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00370 seconds