comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1???

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1???

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1??? [message #14952 is a reply to message #14949]

Fri, 09 April 1999 00:00

lbryanNOSPAM
Messages: 21
Registered: July 1998

Junior Member

Thanks David!!! You're brilliant. RSI support couldn't give me this
answer, but it sure makes sense!

On Thu, 8 Apr 1999 21:42:46 -0600, davidf@dfanning.com (David Fanning)
wrote:

> Lisa Bryan (lbryanNOSPAM@arete-az.com ) writes:
>
>> Below are the results of running the same batch file on the same
>> computer under IDL 5.1 and 5.2 (the two versions were not run at the
>> same time). I tried time_test2 and graphics_times from the library,
>> and they show 5.2 being faster, but I have noticed my large
>> application running significantly slower on 5.2. Anybody know why?
>
> My guess is that the PATHs are different and that the IDL 5.2
> version is searching though more library routines than the IDL 5.1
> version. Try re-arranging your Path so that you search the directories
> with your programs in them first.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
> --
> David Fanning, Ph.D.
> Fanning Software Consulting
> Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
> Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
> Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Lisa Bryan
Arete Associates
Tucson, Arizona
lbryan@arete-az.com

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1??? By: davidf on Sat, 10 April 1999 00:00
		Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1??? By: lbryanNOSPAM on Fri, 09 April 1999 00:00
		Re: 5.2 slower the 5.1??? By: davidf on Thu, 08 April 1999 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: oops - the reference was ..modified bessell functions
Next Topic:	Re: 24-bit color with writable color maps

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 18:43:19 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88034 seconds