comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » global variables and IDLSPEC issues
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Global variables and IDL [message #14979 is a reply to message #11537] Wed, 14 April 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
davidf is currently offline  davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
Senior Member
Rose (rmlongfield@my-dejanews.com) writes:

> My problem is that this tool of mine is getting rather complicated (read:
> messy) and I have three WIDGET_CONTROL, GET_UVALUE statements at the
> beginning of many of my event handlers, because I have several info pointers
> which hold information that I need. (One each from the event ID, top and main
> info) Maybe I am just dis-organized, but it seems to be getting out of hand.

Humm. I've been there before too. And to tell you the truth, I've
even thought about COMMON blocks a time or two. (I never told
anyone COMMON blocks are evil. I've just tried to live my
life as if they were. :-)

But in the end I just either reorganized my program (usually with
some kind of object at the heart of it) or I just turned the whole
mess over to Dick, who is far and away the better programmer, and
went back to work on the theory section of my damn book. :-(

> I am wondering whether using a COMMON statement for a set of
> variables or data arrays that aren't changing would not be such a bad idea.
> What about using constants such as PI or earth radius? Where can they be
> defined once and then used throughout a program ? I am considering putting
> my data in a COMMON statement so that I can get to it in an easy way (i.e.
> without (*(*infoPtr).dataArrPtr) type statements all over the place)

I'm sympathetic. I really am. I'm more sympathetic to constants. (PI by
the way is available via a system variable.) I'm really loath to put
data in common because then you really do lose the ability to use
more than one instance of your program at a time. On the other hand,
how many versions of a program like ENVI do you really want running?

> It is this or re-writing the tool from scratch (which it really needs if only
> I could find the time).

My daddy used to say, "No time to do it right. Plenty of time
to do it over." :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Reading DXF?
Next Topic: Help for Wav

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 16:19:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.47979 seconds