comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: little and big endian -- once more

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: little and big endian -- once more

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: little and big endian -- once more [message #15330 is a reply to message #15329]

Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00

Liam Gumley
Messages: 473
Registered: November 1994

Senior Member

Martin Schultz wrote:
> So, I guess, I should give Liam's suggestion a try.
> Unfortunately, it seems that you must know what's in the file in order
> to test it, but that's probably a good idea anyway when you are dealing
> with binary files ;-)

Yeah, it's pretty hard to read a binary file if you don't know the
format.

> Just for clarification: is it true that the
> endian matters for integers as well as floats?

Yes, it's true.

Here at SSEC we've messed with porting binary datafiles for years.
However in the last year or so, netCDF has become very widely used in
our applications. Some of the reasons are:
(1) No more byte-swapping worries, ever.
(2) The same IDL code can read the same datafile and give the same
results on any IDL platform (Unix, Linux, Windows, Mac).
(3) If you give someone the file and tell them it's netCDF, they can
then easily figure out what it contains. You don't need to tell them the
format details.
(4) The netCDF API is available for Fortran77/90, C, C++, IDL, Matlab,
perl, Python, and Java.
(5) The API is very simple and concise: the only things you can store in
a netCDF file are arrays, attributes, and dimensions. However, you can
create structures using these building blocks which are as simple or as
complex as you like.
(6) netCDF supports the following IDL datatypes: BYTE, STRING, INT,
LONG, FLOAT, DOUBLE.

More information is available at
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/netcdf/faq.html

---
Liam E. Gumley
Space Science and Engineering Center, UW-Madison
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/~gumley

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: little and big endian -- once more By: Dick Jackson on Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00
		Re: little and big endian -- once more By: Liam Gumley on Thu, 13 May 1999 00:00
		Re: little and big endian -- once more By: Martin Schultz on Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00
		Re: little and big endian -- once more By: Liam Gumley on Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00
		Re: little and big endian -- once more By: davidf on Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: coherence test implementation
Next Topic:	Re: Making an array of structures containing pointers

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 07:20:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.11290 seconds