comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL5.3 and documentation
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL5.3 and documentation [message #15525 is a reply to message #15459] Mon, 24 May 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Paul van Delst is currently offline  Paul van Delst
Messages: 364
Registered: March 1997
Senior Member
robert.m.candey.1@gsfc.nasa.gov wrote:

> In article <374224BB.CD038933@wellesley.edu>, rfrench@mediaone.net wrote:
>
>> With his permission, I am posting RSI's Mark Goosman's answer to some
>> questions I posted on this newsgroup recently. He also provided the
>> following information about the next release of IDL:
>>
>> IDL 5.3 is scheduled for October 99.
>>
>> Mark's message:

<snip>

>> Prior to the IDL 5.2 release, we did make an effort to include an HTML
>> version of the IDL documentation. In addition to taking up almost 30% of
>> the total file space, it created a third method of distributing IDL
>> documentation (Original FrameMaker files, Adobe Acrobat, and HTML).
>> This is in addition to the platform specific on-line help. The decision was
>> made to eliminate the HTML files and concentrate on the overall quality of the
>> documentation in PDF format.
>> . . .

Can't resist replying....

For me, improving the quality of the documentation is the ultimate goal. The
second (debatable...should be first?) should be the ease with which information is
retrieved from the on-line doc's. The format that it is in is beyond secondary.
The fact that RSI is paying attention to file space when considering the options
is a good sign. I like documentation to be as comprehensive as the next fella, but
30% of the IDL distribution?

If one were keen to add in their own local routine doc's in line, why should it
matter whether it's HTML or clickable PDF/PS? I don't see why creating any of
these formats is particularly difficult. A WYSIWUG gui to write the documentation
(taken, of course, from the procedure or function prologue) and output the result
in a form that the IDL Online help reader understands

cheers,

paulv

p.s. 2 posts in one morning....I gotta cut back on coffee. Sheesh.

--
Paul van Delst
Space Science and Engineering Center | Ph/Fax: (608) 265-5357, 262-5974
University of Wisconsin-Madison | Email: paul.vandelst@ssec.wisc.edu
1225 W. Dayton St., Madison WI 53706 | Web: http://airs2.ssec.wisc.edu/~paulv
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL's Table Widget
Next Topic: Re: Basic colors for plot

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 11:23:28 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80345 seconds