comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Roundoff error in SMOOTH
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Roundoff error in SMOOTH [message #15623 is a reply to message #15489] Thu, 27 May 1999 00:00 Go to previous message
Boyd Blackwell is currently offline  Boyd Blackwell
Messages: 2
Registered: February 1999
Junior Member
THe IDL smooth function scales well with the number of points in the average
(i.e. smooth(x,10) and smooth(x,1000) take the same time. It is very likely
that it uses an incremental algorithm, whereby result(i) = result(i-1) + x(i+n)
- x(i-1)
where n is the number of points in the average.
This is inherently subject to roundoff error, albeit relatively small.

I can be sure it doe not use FFTs, as it is way too fast for that.



Wayne Landsman wrote:
>
> I was recently surprised to discover that applying the SMOOTH function to a
> non-negative array could yield an array with negative numbers. I give an
> example below. This problem is evidently due to some sort of roundoff error,
> since it does not occur when using double precision. But it is not obvious to
> me how averaging 9 non-negative numbers (for a 3x3 box smooth) could yield a
> negative number, even allowing for roundoff error.
>
> Although not obvious from my simple example, this has nothing to do with edge
> effects -- I originally found the problem when 3x3 smoothing a 1024 x 1024
> array.
>
> --Wayne Landsman landsman@mpb.gsfc.nasa.gov
>
> d = fltarr(11,11) ;Initialize array to zero
> d[ [0,2,0,2],[2,3,4,5] ] = 0.48 ;Set a few values to a positive number
> print,where(d lt 0) ;Make sure there are really no negative values
> ; -1
>
> print,d[1:6,1:6] ;Print a block of numbers in array
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.00000 0.480000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.480000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
>
> dd = smooth(d,3) ;Smooth the array
> print,dd[1:6,1:6] ;After smooothing there are negative values!
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.106667 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.160000 0.106667 0.0533333 -6.62274e-09 -6.62274e-09 -6.62274e-09
> ; 0.106667 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
>
> dd = smooth(double(d),3) ;Negative values do not occur in double precision
> print,float(dd[1:6,1:6])
> ; 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.106667 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.160000 0.106667 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.106667 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> ; 0.0533333 0.0533333 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Temporary variables still checked out
Next Topic: Including files

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 12:05:00 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48183 seconds