comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » writing recursive functions
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: writing recursive functions [message #15646 is a reply to message #15645] Wed, 02 June 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
William Daffer is currently offline  William Daffer
Messages: 34
Registered: February 1999
Member
"Martin Downing" <m.downing@abdn.ac.uk> writes:

Are you using PVWave? fact.pro (take 1) worked fine in IDL 5.1.1.

William


> Hi all,
>
> My aim is to write a function that (recursively) call itself, that can be
> compiled on the fly as with standard code.
> So - whats the problem, well if you _could_ write a function for factorials
> using recursion as:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ; fact.pro : take 1
> ; example of recursion (I know there's a factorial function!!)
> function fact , n=n
> res = float(n)
> if res gt 1 then $
> res = res * fact(n=res-1)
> return, res
> end
> ; (I used a keyword as otherwise it compiles thinking fact() is a variable)
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ....This will not compile
> It appears that the compiler needs something equivalent to a declaration
> statement (as in C code), so I tried to just write a dummy empty function
> above the real code.
>
> e.g.:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ;fact.pro : take2
> ; dummy definition I.e. declaration
> function fact , n
> print, "this should not be called!"
> return, n
> end
>
> ; the real code
> ; example of recursion (I know there's a factorial function!!)
> function fact , n
> res = float(n)
> if res gt 1 then $
> res = res * fact(res-1)
> return, res
> end
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> However, unless this is forcibly compiled (.compile fact.pro), the
> auto-compile will stop after the initial definition.
>
> This leaves two options - permanently compiling the code or calling by
> another routine:
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ; call_fact.pro
> @fact.pro
> function call_fact, n
> return, fact(n)
> end
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Any suggestions welcome
>
> Martin,
> Aberdeen, Scotland
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
Groucho Marx.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL interface to Oracle
Next Topic: Redhat Linux 6.0 troubles continue

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 14:55:07 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36028 seconds