comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL and Dual Processor PC's
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL and Dual Processor PC's [message #15709 is a reply to message #15635] Fri, 04 June 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
rivers is currently offline  rivers
Messages: 228
Registered: March 1991
Senior Member
In article <7j8714$631$1@readme.uio.no>, steinhh@ulrik.uio.no
> (Stein Vidar Hagfors Haugan) writes:
>
> read_image,name2,huge_image
> fft_of_huge_image = fft(huge_image,-1)
> ;; .... processing....
> processed_image = fft(fft_of_huge_image,1)
> save_huge_image,processed_image
>
> ..then you could be getting a lot more value for money if you
> buy two single-processor systems, running them in parallell
> "by hand"...

I might disagree with this. A dual-processor system, running 2 instances of
IDL simultaneously may be better value for money than a second complete
computer. The incremental cost of the second CPU is not that high. One
advantage is that you can put twice as much memory in this machine, and have
all of it available to a single IDL process when you need it. This is what we
are doing - 1 GB of memory on a dual-processor 450 MHz Pentium, Windows NT.
We are running up against the 32 bit memory limitations of Windows and IDL.
Even with 3 GB of swap space, IDL can only access arrays just over 1 GB. It
doesn't take a very big 3-D array to reach that limit!

Mark Rivers
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: axis: color and fonts - how to change it?
Next Topic: widget_programming

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:25:31 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00377 seconds