comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: subsripting array problem
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: subsripting array problem [message #16445] Tue, 27 July 1999 00:00 Go to previous message
Liam Gumley is currently offline  Liam Gumley
Messages: 473
Registered: November 1994
Senior Member
Med Bennett wrote:
> I am just wondering why the following does not work correctly:
>
> timeidx = round(traveltime/100.)-1 ;get index of array
> timeidx = timeidx[0]
> if timeidx ge 0 and timeidx le 199 then $
> gwfluxpa[timeidx:*] = gwfluxpa[timeidx:*] + ic*2500.
>
> If I rewrite this code to the following, it works OK:
>
> timeidx = round(traveltime/100.)-1 ;get index of array
> timeidx = timeidx[0]
> if timeidx ge 0 and timeidx le 199 then begin
> junk = fltarr(200)
> junk[timeidx:*] = ic*2500.
> gwfluxpa = gwfluxpa + junk
> endif

I'm guessing the type and/or value of one of your variables is not what
you expect. The HELP procedure can be useful in solving this type of
problem. For example:

help, traveltime & print, traveltime
timeidx = round(traveltime/100.)-1
help, timeidx & print, timeidx
timeidx = timeidx[0]
help, gwfluxpa & print, gwfluxpa
help, ic & print, ic
if timeidx ge 0 and timeidx le 199 then $
gwfluxpa[timeidx:*] = gwfluxpa[timeidx:*] + ic*2500.

Careful examination of the HELP and PRINT output should identify the
problem. I don't recommend coding workarounds *unless* you understand
the problem first.

Cheers,
Liam.

--
Liam E. Gumley
Space Science and Engineering Center, UW-Madison
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/~gumley
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: idlwave mode for emacs/xemacs?
Next Topic: combine 2 row-vectors to a matrix

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Nov 30 08:25:17 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00825 seconds