| Re: IDL Structures [message #1693 is a reply to message #1690] |
Thu, 10 February 1994 14:35  |
thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
|
Senior Member |
|
|
acdmi@kirk.giss.nasa.gov (Daniel M. Israel) writes:
> I've noticed that IDL seems to treat all structures as arrays of
> structures.
> Example:
> IDL> a={ new_structure, x : 1e0, y : 1e0 }
> IDL> help, /structure, a
> A STRUCT = -> Array(1)
> No matter what I do, I can't get a structure that doesn't think it is part
> of an array of one element. Now I do some things that require
> distungishing between scalars and arrays, where structures should be
> scalars. But IDL thinks all my structures are arrays of one elements. Is
> this a bug in my version? Or is it a bug in IDL? Or is there some reason
> why this notation is useful? (Because I have to kludge around it, it is
> definitely not useful for me.)
As far as I know, this is true of all versions of IDL. I don't know why this
is.
Actually, I'm not sure that it's really important to distinguish between
scalars and arrays that only have one element. It used to be important, but
later versions of IDL have been breaking down the distinctions. I've been
simply using the N_ELEMENTS() function lately to distinguish between arrays and
"scalars", rather than using the first element of the SIZE() function as I used
to do.
Of course, your mileage may vary. :^)
Bill Thompson
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
