comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » a plea for more reliable mathematical routines
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: a plea for more reliable mathematical routines [message #17177 is a reply to message #17029] Tue, 14 September 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Theo Brauers is currently offline  Theo Brauers
Messages: 58
Registered: November 1997
Member
Liam Gumley wrote:
>
> .... You must understand that for most IDL users, the *program* isn't
> the point: the *data* and the *visualization* are the point. Most of my
> colleagues don't get paid for writing elegant OOP applications; they get
> paid for coming up with new algorithms, visualizations, and publications
> from the analysis of remotely sensed data.
>
Fully agreed at this point. But the question was how to get reliable math
in IDL. Worse than spending time on programming is providing wrong data
and procedures. If your experiment/group/department uses your code based
on bad math in IDL then your are stuck and your colleages come up with:
There several ready to use libaries (IMSL, NAG, ...) why dont you use
them.

Cheers
Theo


http://www.kfa-juelich.de/icg/icg3/MITARBEITER/th.brauers.ht ml
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Inexpensive / free-ware similar to IDL?
Next Topic: I/O on ECMWF GRIB data

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:36:04 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00496 seconds