comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: where() and IEEE NaN
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: where() and IEEE NaN [message #17803 is a reply to message #17798] Fri, 05 November 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Pavel Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel Romashkin
Messages: 166
Registered: April 1999
Senior Member
I am not sure if trying to use WHERE on NaN is legitimate. NaN is a
missing value by definition, and the request to WHERE those values is
senseless. However, I'd too better like WHERE to complain than to
quietly return some array.

It does not seem to be a *practical* problem because NaNs don't sneak
into your arrays unless you place them in. And if you do, then handle
them accordingly.

As for whether its right or wrong, I think someone said it before: iI am
more interested in how to do what I need, not in how I think they did it
wrong.

Cheers,
Pavel


Todd Bowers wrote:

> IDL> a = [1,2,!Values.F_NaN,4,!Values.F_NaN]
> IDL> print, a
> 1.00000 2.00000 NaN 4.00000 NaN
> IDL> print, where(a EQ !Values.F_NaN)
> 0 1 2 3 4
>
> Hmmmmmm.... is this a known feature? The where() help says
> nothin' about NaN's.
> IDL v5.2a
>
> Thanks
> Todd
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Center of mass???
Next Topic: Re: contour plots on walls of a cube

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 20:13:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00249 seconds