comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Strange memory problem
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Strange memory problem [message #18333 is a reply to message #18329] Wed, 22 December 1999 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wbiagiot is currently offline  wbiagiot
Messages: 59
Registered: January 1999
Member
In article <38602B16.5EDA39B@resource-eng.com>,
"Mark D. Williams" <markw-xxxnospamxxx@resource-eng.com> wrote:

>
> FWIW, if you want to save time and memory, a faster way to do the
above
> is as follows:
>
> WAVE> temp = BYTARR(1000,1000,25, /NoZero) + 10B
>


Mark,

FWIW, I don't often comment on programming examples posted here even
though I usually try them out. I was floored by the benchmark
comparisons that I got when checking out your idea. I have a Win95
Pentium 200 32Mb machine w/ IDL 5.2.1. I didn't run an exact time count
but I estimate your idea being ~30 times faster (~4 seconds vs. over a
minute). Also, and perhaps more importantly, IDL consumed only 25-26
Mbytes operating on your code and 125-126 Mbytes on the original
(obviously churning like crazy)!!!

I regularly work with large arrays and need to go back into my
application to see if I can utilize this.

Thanks for an eye-opener!

Bill B.


--
"They don't think it be like it is, but it do."

Oscar Gamble, NY Yankees


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: idl 5.3 runtime on idl 5.2 system work?
Next Topic: fortran .dll using ms powerstation

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 06:02:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.04164 seconds