comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave [message #187 is a reply to message #185]

Fri, 20 September 1991 12:25

jennifer
Messages: 8
Registered: October 1991

Junior Member

Just this morning I noticed another difference between IDL and WAVE
-- WAVE is supposed to support CGM output whereas IDL does not claim
to. Unfortunately, it turns out that the WAVE CGM does not conform
to the standard. This is a problem for me, as the software that
drives our film recorder supports CGM, but chokes on the files
from WAVE. The film recorder does not support any of the other
formats written by IDL or WAVE. I was hoping RSI would have solved
the non-standard CGM problem, but CGM is not listed in the supported
"devices." Has anyone come up against this problem, or have any
suggestions for me?

Thanks,

Jennifer Dungan jennifer@vessna.arc.nasa.gov
TGS Technology Inc.
MS 242-4
NASA/GSFC
Moffett Field, CA 94035
(415) 604-3618

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: thompson on Tue, 24 September 1991 13:23
		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: bdavis on Mon, 23 September 1991 10:42
		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: hunt on Fri, 20 September 1991 12:50
		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: jennifer on Fri, 20 September 1991 12:25
		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: dwight on Fri, 20 September 1991 08:54
		Re: On the differences between idl and pvwave By: keller on Thu, 19 September 1991 20:12

Previous Topic:	Re: Linking IDL with FORTRAN routines under UNIX: interpol.pro
Next Topic:	Re: Linking IDL with FORTRAN routines under UNIX: interpol.f

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 09:18:01 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.31876 seconds