comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Not where
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Not where [message #18860 is a reply to message #18780] Mon, 07 February 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
bowman is currently offline  bowman
Messages: 121
Registered: September 1991
Senior Member
In article <bowman-0702000905130001@bowman.tamu.edu>, bowman@null.edu
(Kenneth P. Bowman) wrote:

> It would be nice to have an auxiliary array containing all the indices
> that are *not* returned by WHERE in i.

Thanks for all the replies. Rather than appear to favor one, I decided to
reply to my own posting. ;-)

The short answer seems to be no, there is no fast and easy way, although I
tend to favor Liam's approach as being most similar to the existing WHERE
function.

-------------

On another subject, I have been browsing through the "What's New in IDL
5.3" volume (thanks for earlier help from this group) and have discovered
several improvements that have been proposed in this group (at least I
thought they were good ideas!), although they are not necessarily easy to
find.

The TOTAL function now includes a CUMULATIVE keyword. This makes it easy
to convert histograms into cumulative histograms (among other things).

Speaking of not easy to find ;-), the new bisection search function is
called VALUE_LOCATE. I do like the way it is implemented, though.`

Ken
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: iterating POLY_2D
Next Topic: REQ: alternative plot procedure?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 03:47:36 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.56546 seconds