| Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic [message #19052 is a reply to message #19024] |
Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00   |
David McClain
Messages: 17
Registered: January 1999
|
Junior Member |
|
|
I knew that if you thought about it you would begin to understand my
point...
Try this one... Give me a function to return the array result of removing
selected items from an argument array.
Since I can't pass a testing function to that routine (IDL doesn't have
higher order functions), I will accept a routine, for illustrative purposes,
that removes all even values from the array.
Now suppose some joker passes an array containing only even values to that
routine...
- DM
Craig Markwardt <craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu> wrote in message
news:onya8drxcf.fsf@cow.physics.wisc.edu...
>
> Pavel Romashkin <pavel@netsrv1.cmdl.noaa.gov> writes:
>
>>> What can you say of a language that is purely array oriented, but
>>> cannot comprehend the existence of an empty array?
>>
>> Agreeing with D.F., I so far had no use for an empty array. I
>> understand it is not flexible, but I usually work on data other than
>> nothing.
>
> Forgive him, he knows not what he says.
>
> Empty arrays would be invaluable in both indexing (such as with WHERE)
> and array concatenation. By invaluable, I mean that it would remove a
> lot of the special casing. Consider these examples:
>
> ARRAY INDEXING - indexing with where()
> *With* an empty array:
> wh = where(array GT thresh, /EMPTY)
> array(wh) = 0 ;; indexing with empty array has no effect
> *Without* an empty array
> wh = where(array GT thresh, count)
> if count GT 0 then array(wh) = 0
>
> ARRAY CONCATENATION - growing an array
> *With* an empty array:
> l = empty_array()
> for i = 0, 100 do if expression(values) then l = [l, values]
> *Without* an empty array:
> for i = 0, 100 do $
> if expression then $
> if n_elements(l) EQ 0 then l = [values] else l = [l, values]
>
> As you can see, the "with" code is more simple and easy to read. The
> "without" (which represents the status quo) has special cases which
> ruin the flow of thought. For a vectorized language, this is a
> painful burden to bear sometimes. If you don't believe me, try doing
> the following (apparently simple) problem:
>
> * given two arrays, A and B: concatenate all but the last two
> elements of A, with B. Don't try [A(0:n-3),B], or you will be in a
> world of hurt.
>
> Craig
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
> Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
> Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
