comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » widget

Home » Public Forums » archive » widget_table

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: widget_table [message #19111 is a reply to message #15223]

Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00

Pavel Romashkin
Messages: 166
Registered: April 1999

Senior Member

I had some unconvenient data entry needs too. If all you need is have
the job done, why not use widget_table, even with an extra row and
column? It still functions, even with extra cells around it. David's
suggestion was aimed at a hard-core IDLer and would produce far-fetching
results. But the effort you'd need to put in it (not having David's
experience) would be inadequate. I suggest using widget_table and you
can then go on with the application. I suppose observing the table is
not the purpose of it? If it is, Excel is better: coloring, shading and
all those fancy borders :-)

Cheers,
Pavel

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		widget_table By: R.Bauer on Mon, 26 April 1999 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: davidf on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: Ben Tupper on Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: davidf on Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: Pavel Romashkin on Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: reardonb on Thu, 24 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: davidf on Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00
		Re: widget_table By: Jean H. on Thu, 24 May 2007 09:01
		Re: widget_table By: David Fanning on Thu, 24 May 2007 09:03
		Re: widget_table By: 2d on Thu, 19 July 2007 12:24
		Re: widget_table By: Michael Galloy on Thu, 19 July 2007 16:12
		Re: widget_table By: Jean H. on Tue, 17 July 2007 14:21
		Re: widget_table By: David Fanning on Tue, 17 July 2007 14:21

Previous Topic:	making DIALOG_MESSAGE jump out
Next Topic:	Tab completion of variables and routines at the IDL command line

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 01:33:45 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.20263 seconds