comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Can this be done using CALL

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? [message #19325 is a reply to message #19321]

Thu, 09 March 2000 00:00

davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996

Senior Member

Ed Meinel (edward.s.meinel@aero.org) writes:

> No, I'm not too scared... I usually like to wait one major upgrade
> before starting to use a new capability. This gives RSI a chance to fix
> all the bugs that David found ;-)

Well, that's probably good advice. The only trouble with it is that
if everyone follows it no bugs are found or fixed. :-(

> How many of you started using the HANDLE_* routines as soon as
> IDL4 came out?

It is funny how these things evolve. I don't think handles
would have happened at all, except that I started to advertise
that I could teach people how to use "pointers" in IDL classes.
We were using the user value of unrealized base widgets as
pointers or handles. I remember being surrounded by a bunch
of developers in the hallway once. They had one of my brochures
and they were in an ugly mood. "What the hell is this pointer
nonsense, Fanning?", they demanded.

"Uh, well, they aren't *really* pointers, but look what we
can do with them", I said. Next thing I knew we had an
unrealized base widget with everything stripped off it
except the user value and renamed a "handle". And, of course,
since that really didn't do *exactly* what we wanted either,
we soon had real pointers. (Well, as real as you are likely
to get in a language like IDL.)

But I do like the direction the language is evolving in.
I just wish they wouldn't make such a big mystery of all
the new object graphics capabilities. I just can't figure
why they want to hide this light under their bushel basket.
I'd be telling the whole world about it. Especially those
young pups who think Matlab is the cat's meow.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: davidf on Thu, 09 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: Struan Gray on Thu, 09 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: davidf on Thu, 09 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: edward.s.meinel on Thu, 09 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: davidf on Wed, 08 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: Struan Gray on Wed, 08 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: John-David T. Smith on Wed, 08 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: edward.s.meinel on Wed, 08 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: John-David T. Smith on Tue, 07 March 2000 00:00
		Re: Can this be done using CALL_FUNCTION? By: Martin Schultz on Tue, 07 March 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	Converting 8-bit image + pallete to 24 bit image with alpha channel
Next Topic:	silly font problem

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 18:40:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.63830 seconds