comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL, Matlab, Mathematica, Maple...
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL, Matlab, Mathematica, Maple... [message #19638 is a reply to message #19634] Mon, 10 April 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David McClain is currently offline  David McClain
Messages: 17
Registered: January 1999
Junior Member
IDL and MatLab are intrinsically numeric modeling languages - no symbolic
capabilities. Mathematica, Maple, Derive, Macsyma are symbolic languages
with very poor performance for numeric modeling.

But why give up one for the other? With Mathematica there is a Mathlink
connection to NML which is superior in performance to IDL. But if you don't
want to learn functional programming, you can also use IDL because there is
an RPC link from NML to IDL. That way you have the best of both worlds!

- DM

Sang-Heon Shim <sangshim@princeton.edu> wrote in message
news:38EFE9C5.1C84B373@princeton.edu...
> Dear Experts,
> I don't think it is appropriate to ask this question here. But...
> I have used IDL for my research (mostly fit and plot big datasets and
> do numerical simulations) last 3 years and enjoyed a lot. Recently I am
> interested in other math softwares but I cannot find information like
> "which is good for which".
> Would you compare IDL, Matlab, Mathematica, and Maple?
> Thanks.
>
> Dan
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: control precision for the axis ticks
Next Topic: Re: Using CALL_EXTERNAL with a pointer to a pointer

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:15:24 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00208 seconds