comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Object Rubberband Selection Box
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Object Rubberband Selection Box [message #19803 is a reply to message #19796] Mon, 24 April 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
davidf is currently offline  davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
Senior Member
Just a follow-up to my own post. I wrote:

> I checked with the folks at RSI (luckily) before I chucked
> my graphics accelerator card out the window, and they tell
> me that IDL's software renderer has been optimized for
> object instancing. I'm still dubious, but the results
> are irrefutable in this instance. :-)

I'm no longer dubious. I'm a believer. :-)

I've heard now from someone who I am certain knows
what is going on and he reports that the software
renderer has been "HEAVILY" optimized (his words)
for instancing.

Moreover, he reports that software rendering has
a very high percentage chance of being faster than
hardware rendering for both images and volumes,
which some graphics cards have problems with. And
this, too, squares with my personal experience.

I have a new rule of thumb (actually, it's an old
rule of thumb that I somehow forgot): if it doesn't
work right and you think it should, try the software
renderer. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: linking programs/ procedures
Next Topic: Re: Polygons and polylines

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 12:04:20 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.28075 seconds