comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Top 10 IDL Requests
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Top 10 IDL Requests [message #20798 is a reply to message #20666] Tue, 25 July 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wmc is currently offline  wmc
Messages: 117
Registered: February 1995
Senior Member
David Fanning <davidf@dfanning.com> wrote:
> William (wmc@bas.ac.uk) writes:
>> If so, could this be extended to allow *any* structures to be put into
>> arrays? Is there any particular reason why all array elements have to
>> be the same type of structure?

> This is the idea behind the changes in IDL 5.4. As long
> as the array elements "match" in the sense of having the
> same amount of storage allocated to them, structures
> can be put into arrays, etc.

Ah, no, thats not enough. I want, say, structures which represent a data
agglomeration (I'm trying not to say object) with loads of header fields
the same, but a few fields (maybe just the one "data" field) different.
So the storage is different. I know I could do this by putting a pointer
into the structure instead, but... I can't see why IDL shouldn't do this itself.
I guess I'm assuming that, when IDL stores an array of strucutures, it doesn't
store the structures consecutively anyway - just pointers to the structures.
In which case, it shouldn't matter what the structure types are. I think.

-W.

ps - I'll hide this here so as to not start a perl/idl war: I use both a
lot and I like the syntax of both. But... occaisionally the clunkiness
of IDL does irritate a little. Like, not allowing null arrays.

--
William M Connolley | wmc@bas.ac.uk | http://www.nerc-bas.ac.uk/icd/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | Disclaimer: I speak for myself
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: avs field
Next Topic: Dear Santa: PVWAVE Style Date/Time Axes in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 02:32:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.44175 seconds