comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » 3D plot symbols
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: 3D plot symbols [message #20866 is a reply to message #20780] Thu, 27 July 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
rkj is currently offline  rkj
Messages: 66
Registered: February 1996
Member
David Fanning (davidf@dfanning.com) wrote:
: R. Kyle Justice (rkj@dukebar.crml.uab.edu) writes:
:
: > I would like to be able to create a 3-D scatter plot
: > with 3-D symbols. It would be nice if I could define
: > a cube with USERSYM. I can almost get what I want
: > using PLOTS but the symbols are "flat" in 3-D.

: I have a feeling the PLOTS symbols are "flat"
: because you forgot to set a T3D keyword on the
: PLOTS command. :-)

I am using the T3D keyword. The reason the symbols are
flat is because they have no depth. USERSYM only takes
x and y vertices. The plot is rendered properly, even
the symbols. They appear flat because they only have
1 side (actually 2, I guess; front and back).


: I can't see any reason why 3D symbols with PLOTS
: would be prohibited, even in PV-Wave, which I
: assume you are using.

Yep, I am primarily using PV-Wave but I don't really see
a way to get 3-D symbols in IDL either, at least not
with USERSYM. Is there a way to make 3-D symbols? This
would be a nice feature, especially since the 2-D symbols
appear to be rendered as if they are 3-D.


: > Can I get this functionality using the polygon
: > rendering routines? I am particularly worried about
: > speed since the plot will be animated (continuously
: > updated as symbol values change).

: I think speed will be a problem using PLOTS. I'd
: offer you something in the line of object graphics
: 3D scatterplots, but I doubt it would apply. :-(

It appears to be fast enough for my purposes with 2-D
symbols. If I have to use the polygon routines I'm
sure to get a big slowdown, even if I knew what I
was going (and I don't).

Why does the object graphics suggestion not surprise
me ;-)


: Cheers,

: David

Kyle
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Faster linear interpolation?
Next Topic: Re: Displaying Medical Images Anonymously

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 07:52:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96014 seconds