comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Top 10 IDL Requests
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Top 10 IDL Requests [message #21015 is a reply to message #20666] Wed, 02 August 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Plonski is currently offline  Michael Plonski
Messages: 5
Registered: May 2000
Junior Member
I sent a where-not request to rsinc a few years back and nothing
happened. I put together a system that processes Gigabytes of satellite
data every day. It has to take several extra passes through the data
because there is no way to do effecient nested wheres. Basically, I
want to run a new where on the result of the where-not in order to do
further segmentation on the items not segmented out by the first where
command. I also first asked for user defined map projections probably 6
or 7 years ago. That never happened either, even when I said, well
PV-Wave has it (or at least claims to).

If fact the only time I ever got RSI to make a change was when I showed
that something in version 5 didn't work the same as version 4 (how the
sign bit is promoted in byte to short to long conversions when they
introduced the concept of unsigned). It might have been 5.2 .vs. 5.1
instead of 5 .v.s. 4. This seemed to be a high priority for them since
it meant Version 5 wouldn't give the same numerical answer as version 4
in some really limited cases. It did break some code I was using and
took a while to track down.

Mike Plonski


"Liam E. Gumley" wrote:
>
> Craig Markwardt wrote:
>>
>> "Liam E. Gumley" <Liam.Gumley@ssec.wisc.edu> writes:
>>> Michael Plonski wrote:
>>>> 1) Complement of Where - so the same call returns where, and a named
>>>> variable returns where-not
>>>
>>> FUNCTION WHERENOT, TEST, COUNT
>>> return, where(test eq 0, count)
>>> END
>> ...
>>> It requires another 'where' call if you want the where and where-not,
>>> but I'm guessing this functionality isn't needed that often.
>>
>> No, Mr. Plonski, myself, and several others on this news group were
>> asking for the WHERE and its complement in the same function call. It
>> does come up a fair amount for me, and it can be a big computation
>> expense to do WHERE twice if the arrays are large.
>
> Well now is the time to ask for this feature in WHERE (while IDL 5.4 is
> still in Beta). Perhaps a COMPLEMENT keyword could be added: I'm not
> that fond of optional arguments.
>
> I suggest that anybody who wants this feature send email to RSI
> (mailto:support@rsinc.com) with the subject 'Feature Request' asking for
> this functionality to be added to WHERE.
>
> Cheers,
> Liam.
> http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/~gumley
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: avs field
Next Topic: Dear Santa: PVWAVE Style Date/Time Axes in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:11:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.52138 seconds