comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: A related question...

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: A related question...

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Wed, 09 August 2000 00:00

davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996

Senior Member

Med Bennett (mbennett@indra.com) writes:

> OK, I have tried rewriting my procedure to reduce the number of main level
> variables created by passing all of the variables it needs, rather than
> running it as a main level program. However, I now get the message
>
> '% Procedure/function called with too many parameters: XSPLOT.'
>
> I'm trying to give it 14 variables as parameters. What's a lousy programmer
> to do?

Common blocks. :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. I'd put my money on programmer error rather
than IDL restrictions, in this case. :-)

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: A related question... By: R.Bauer on Thu, 10 August 2000 00:00
		Re: A related question... By: davidf on Wed, 09 August 2000 00:00
		Re: A related question... By: davidf on Wed, 09 August 2000 00:00
		Re: A related question... By: Med Bennett on Wed, 09 August 2000 00:00
		Re: A related question... By: davidf on Wed, 09 August 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	page orientation
Next Topic:	string to array conversion

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Dec 02 14:37:58 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80403 seconds