comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » contour fill
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: contour fill [message #21445 is a reply to message #21378] Sat, 26 August 2000 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Craig Markwardt is currently offline  Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
Senior Member
davidf@dfanning.com (David Fanning) writes:
> Leaving aside the observation that getting *something*
> to work is not exactly the same as getting the *right*
> thing to work, I'm still concerned that the poor fellow
> is not working on the right thing. :-(
>
> Unless your goal is some kind of pseudo-science, working
> with the representation of the data rather than the data
> itself is rarely a good idea.

He was asking *how?*. You are asking *why?*. Both are fair
questions.

You wondered why a basic threshold wouldn't work. I think his reply
was that he wanted to select a *particular* contour. When there are
several peaks in the data then a simple threshold will not work. As I
pointed out the hardest part in the algorithm I gave is selecting the
right contour. [And I gave a posible heuristic to decide.]

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL EPA Exam Test Question
Next Topic: Re: reading dem

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 00:19:14 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.80073 seconds