comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado
Home » Public Forums » archive » Structure field concatenation
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend  		Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Structure field concatenation [message #21662 is a reply to message #21614] Wed, 06 September 2000 08:24 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
davidf is currently offline  davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
Senior Member
Martin Schultz (martin.schultz@dkrz.de) writes:

> The only reason to do this that I could accept without further
> quirking is if you tell me there is a lot of penalty if you manually
> deallocate and reallocate the memory instead of letting IDL do it.
> Haven't tested, but I would doubt that it makes a big difference.

I really don't think there is any difference at all.
If it makes you feel safer, by all means free pointers
yourself. I just wanted to make the point once again that
IDL really does have some nice features. This aspect
of pointer memory management is one of them. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDLgrROI and normalized coords
Next Topic: Re: taking the widget plunge. help

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:30:33 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00432 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.7.
Copyright ©2001-2013 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software