| Re: IDL produced postscript files in latex [message #22168 is a reply to message #22029] |
Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00   |
noymer
Messages: 65
Registered: June 1999
|
Member |
|
|
In article <gurman-793C78.10341818102000@news.crosslink.net>,
"Joseph B. Gurman" <gurman@ari.net> wrote:
> in the macro (usually called something like "psfig")
As I and several others have pointed out, EPS not PS files
should be used, so perhaps you mean epsfig? which is obsolete
and maintained only for backwards compatibility.
> By the way, the macros are written in TeX (as opposed to LaTeX),
Macro internals are *irrevelant* here. RTFM and you won't *ever*
have to look at a macro internal, at least not for something so
mundane as inserting an EPS file.
> usage in which "user" matches that of "drug user." I wish we could
> forget about LaTeX entirely, but many professional journals and
Excuse me, I thought this was comp.lang.idl-pvwave
> They claim it's "free," not counting the number of sys admin
> hours required to get dvi2<output device> software to work,
If it takes your sysadmin hours to do this, methinks you need
a new sysadmin.
Just my $0.02. :-)
- Andrew
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
