comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDLWAVE 4.5

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 [message #22322 is a reply to message #22058]

Tue, 31 October 2000 15:14

promashkin
Messages: 169
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

Vapuser wrote:

> It is, without a doubt, the absolute best way to write IDL I've
> found

I believe you. I was so tempted by this thread that I tried to set up
Xemacs again on my PPC. Another couple hours wasted, but not the whole
day - I got smarter. I can't figure it out. Sorry. I believe IDLWAVE is
great, but with the dumb brains inside my head I am sticking to the IDL
DE :-(
Cheers,
Pavel

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDLWAVE 4.5 By: dominik on Mon, 16 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: dominik on Mon, 23 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: John-David T. Smith on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: mole6e23 on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Kenneth Mankoff on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: promashkin on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Martin Schultz on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Karsten Rodenacker on Wed, 18 October 2000 00:00
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Vapuser on Thu, 02 November 2000 11:03
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Matt Haffner on Wed, 01 November 2000 14:38
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Paul van Delst on Wed, 01 November 2000 06:07
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: promashkin on Tue, 31 October 2000 15:14
		Re: IDLWAVE 4.5 By: Vapuser on Tue, 31 October 2000 14:26

Previous Topic:	Re: trapping type conversion errors
Next Topic:	Plotting in double precesion

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:56:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00183 seconds