comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: DG SURFACEs: opaque vs. transparent
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: DG SURFACEs: opaque vs. transparent [message #22431 is a reply to message #22428] Tue, 14 November 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
Jaco van Gorkom is currently offline  Jaco van Gorkom
Messages: 97
Registered: November 2000
Member
Drawing a wire mesh is not supposed to have an opaque
effect, I suppose... I haven't tried, but SHADE_SURF should
do the trick, with the keyword SHADES set to an array of
!p.background (so that it just erases, without light source
shading).
So first set up the transform, then do your plot on the wall, then
erase the surface, then draw a wire mesh again.

No doubt you will run into yet another problem, but it should be
fun. I find it hard to believe, though, that all this will lead to a plot of
outstanding clarity... :-)
Jaco


"Andrew" <noymer@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8uqth9$hf8$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> Dear C.l.i-p,
>
> Is there a way to make DG SURFACEs opaque as opposed
> to transparent? I've got lines showing.
>
> I'm not talking about hidden line removal, rather
> the fact that other graphs that go "under" the
> surface (according to the perspective) show though.
> Thuis is when, e.g., I draw a surface and then a 2D
> plot, projected onto one of the walls of the aquarium.
>
> This arose from my finding a solution to my earlier
> problem...
>
> TIA,
> Andrew
>
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: IDL Programming Techniques, 2nd Edition Available
Next Topic: DG SURFACEs: opaque vs. transparent

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Mon Apr 27 09:30:15 PDT 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.99999 seconds