comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Bad data in structure (NaN HowTo?)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Bad data in structure (NaN HowTo?) [message #22672 is a reply to message #22582] Mon, 27 November 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
Pavel A. Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
Randall Skelton wrote:

> I am certainly open to suggestions on how to organize this data... It is
> spectroscopic remote sensing data and during measurements I get a dump of
> all of the sensor data (every 2 seconds) and one high resolution spectrum
> of the atmosphere. The 400+ items in the structure correspond to
> instrument readings (i.e. exact GMT time, spacecraft orientation data,
> latitude, longitude, etc...) and different data-streams (i.e. point arrays
> for each useful spectral window, an oversampled pointing mirror array,
> gyro arrays, etc...).

On the second though... maybe its allright as it is? :-(
I see now that the amount of data you have is huge. Besides, it keeps
coming, huh. Maybe then just make an interface to shield yourself from
the 450 fields (which send chill down my spine) and let IDL handle the
mess internally.
By the way, I thought you have and array of those structures. Replacing
your -12345 can be done on all of the structures in the array in one
step with the "500 lbs gorilla" method. IDL is smart enough to index all
arrays in a field of a structure array.

Cheers,
Pavel
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Mixing ASCII and Binary in files
Next Topic: Re: FSC_surface and xsurface under LINUX/IDL5.3

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:36:51 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00384 seconds