comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Classification of objects in 2D image
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Classification of objects in 2D image [message #23002 is a reply to message #22764] Mon, 18 December 2000 06:33 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Ben Tupper is currently offline  Ben Tupper
Messages: 186
Registered: August 1999
Senior Member
Hello,

If I understand you correctly, you have the the image segemented
into 'features' and 'background'. I do have an object (still in
the development stage that will spit out 'feature'
characteristics given a segemented image with only one
'feature'. I don't have it handy here, but I could send it to
you soon.

One limitation it has (a least a limitation for me) is a 'good'
way of finding the perimeter of the feature. I use the CONTOUR
procedure on a binary version of the image. The results are OK
for me, but IDL may not be calculating that perimeter the way you
would want.

Ben

Norbert Hahn wrote:

> Ben Tupper <pemaquidriver@tidewater.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Could you describe the images you have in hand? I have a
>> number of thought, but it helps to know where your staring
>> point is.
>
> The images are greyscale images of crystals viewed under
> a microscope. This is an attempt to classify the quality
> of food by dissolving some salt in milk and evaporating
> the liquid. Other components are removed too until the
> salt crystals are left over.
>>
>> Here are some questions that might determine the approach
>> you take:
>> -Are the images of 'natural' samples with lots of
>> detritus/junk floating around?
>
> There is little junk floating around when the experiment
> is correctly done.
>
>> -Is the background uniform or varying?
>
> The background is uniform in a single picture but varies
> from picture to picture. The threshold has to be adjusted
> for each picture, but that seems to be manageable.
>
>> -Are the features detectable with a simple threshold
>> applied to the entire image, or do you need to consider
>> regional thresholding?
>
> A simple threshold for the entire image should be sufficient.
>
>> -Do you have only one image per field of view or do you
>> have multiple images for each field of view?
>
> There is only one image per sample of the fluid under test.
>
> One of the major problems is that the crystals have a
> varying orientation from picture to picture. Other
> properties such a shape, size and clustering vary little
> within one class. So variations of shape, size and
> clusterings should be detected and grouped into various
> classes.
>
> Norbert

--
Ben Tupper
248 Lower Round Pond Road
POB 106
Bristol, ME 04539

Tel: (207) 563-1048
Email: PemaquidRiver@tidewater.net
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Join the PV-WAVE Team
Next Topic: underscore bug?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 11:49:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.79778 seconds